<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Recoding the Site</title>
	<atom:link href="http://douglas.nerad.org/journal/2007/02/recoding-the-site/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://douglas.nerad.org/journal/2007/02/recoding-the-site/</link>
	<description>Every Band of Freaks</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2011 03:18:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adrian</title>
		<link>http://douglas.nerad.org/journal/2007/02/recoding-the-site/comment-page-1/#comment-14230</link>
		<dc:creator>Adrian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2007 03:19:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://douglas.nerad.org/journal/2007/02/08/recoding-the-site/#comment-14230</guid>
		<description>Cool--thanks.  The site has been very helpful to me, as more of a hack than a coder.   I&#039;ve currently been searching for a plugin to display the next &quot;x&quot; number of blog posts and came across &quot;moreentries&quot;, but its description implies it&#039;s a very inefficient solution that&#039;s processor intensive, so I&#039;ve been hesitant.  At any rate, don&#039;t work too hard now.  :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cool&#8211;thanks.  The site has been very helpful to me, as more of a hack than a coder.   I&#8217;ve currently been searching for a plugin to display the next &#8220;x&#8221; number of blog posts and came across &#8220;moreentries&#8221;, but its description implies it&#8217;s a very inefficient solution that&#8217;s processor intensive, so I&#8217;ve been hesitant.  At any rate, don&#8217;t work too hard now.  :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: douglas</title>
		<link>http://douglas.nerad.org/journal/2007/02/recoding-the-site/comment-page-1/#comment-13858</link>
		<dc:creator>douglas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Feb 2007 08:40:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://douglas.nerad.org/journal/2007/02/08/recoding-the-site/#comment-13858</guid>
		<description>No, it won&#039;t go dormant though it has been aweful quiet. I&#039;m still using Blosxom for approximately 10 other sites that I&#039;ve set up for friends and I still read the list. In fact Axel informed me today that posting to the site is wonked so I have to fix that. If only I hadn&#039;t just worked a 12 hour day with another one tomorrow...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, it won&#8217;t go dormant though it has been aweful quiet. I&#8217;m still using Blosxom for approximately 10 other sites that I&#8217;ve set up for friends and I still read the list. In fact Axel informed me today that posting to the site is wonked so I have to fix that. If only I hadn&#8217;t just worked a 12 hour day with another one tomorrow&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adrian</title>
		<link>http://douglas.nerad.org/journal/2007/02/recoding-the-site/comment-page-1/#comment-13838</link>
		<dc:creator>Adrian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Feb 2007 05:13:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://douglas.nerad.org/journal/2007/02/08/recoding-the-site/#comment-13838</guid>
		<description>Will the Unofficial Blosxom UG go dormant?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Will the Unofficial Blosxom UG go dormant?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

