2003.02.05
2003.02.05
perhaps i am to harsh in my criticism of bush. i am not alone, however, in being his critic (like this “analysis” of the state of the union address). every president goes through this, i’m sure. understand, while i am liberal i am not a liberal wanker. i’m not one of these people who goes blindly through life berating the world for being unequal, unjust and unfair (despite the fact that it is). it is possible to be a liberal and still be critical of those who claim to be representatives of that state of mind.
however, we are talking about bush, who can barely utter a sentence without stumbling over a word here, a country there, a few rights somewhere else (and we can debate all those points if you want).
i do like bush. he’s almost impossible not to like in a lost-child-smiling-at-you kind of way. i just don’t think he should be leading our nation -especially these years- let alone texas, or a corporation. maybe a household, despite his daughters constantly getting in trouble.
anyways, i’m sick of it all. one of the myriad reasons i went to prague was because i hated to politics of this country.
have i mentioned this before? we need to implement a vote of no confidence. imagine that. it would never pass as those who would have to legislate it would be the first to go, but that would be grand. bush and gore wouldn’t have made it and the other candidates wouldn’t have had enough votes to be elected. we’d have to have another election. if those candidates didn’t make it then another election.
the same for the legislature! bring it on!
it’ll never happen, but i can dream.
Categorized: political thoughts
You can follow any responses to this entry with a RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.
