2002.10.14
2002.10.14
quick follow up to the previous entry. one of the points i was trying to make was the apparent confusion on how to treat copyright. is it property or is it not?
todd was kind enough to send me a series of links concerning copyright that may be useful to anyone interested in pursuing some of these issues:
two articles on the current supreme court case:
general and a bit more specificcopyright basics, right from the horse’s mouth.
been thinking about dreams and their analysis again. i think reading joseph campbell is affecting me. maybe because he’s talking about carl jung, and both times i’ve read jung’s books i had very intense dreams for months afterwards.
You can follow any responses to this entry with a RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
